|
Post by number1dan on Oct 10, 2009 9:39:41 GMT
i have this idea for the points sysem for the SLCC, but it may b flawed.
the winner of the club championship should be the average points per driver + the square root of total points for that club, that way the club with the most drivers wont neccesarily win but a club with only a few drivers CANT win it as there avereage points may be gd but there total points wont be enough. my arguement is that if a club has lots and lots and lots of bad drivers then they will win the club championship due to numbers and a club 2/3 of the amount of drivers but they r all very good wont win it even tho they should because they r the "better" club. For example if club A had 70 drivers with an average points per drive of 300, their "score" would be 300 + SQR RT of 21000= 444.9
Club B has 50 Drivers with average points of 350 then their score would be 482.3 hence they would win. is that beter than the current system?
i no the numbers i used couldn't be possible but u no what im getting at
|
|
|
Post by yellowshark on Oct 10, 2009 10:01:59 GMT
I raised this at the start of the season Dan.I do not for one moment think we did not deserve to win last year or this year. As a club we have supported the series as much as any club and more than most. But it did seem to me a bit unfair on the smaller clubs, I was particularly thinking of Yeovil, who don't stand a cat in hells chance of winning. If they fielded 9 drivers and finished 1,2,3 in each of the classes and we fielded 15 drivers all finishing in C finals we would beat them. May be that is just the way it has to be, I sure don't know what the answer is. One answer is to have a manufacturer's cup (Ian?). If Yeovil all changed to T3s they could win that
|
|
|
Post by number1dan on Oct 10, 2009 10:22:32 GMT
i didnt say that the club didnt deserve to win, i just agree that clubs like yeovil and others like it should stand a chance, however my system is not so biased that a club with 1 excellent driver is gonna win as the majority of the points will be the SQR RT of the total. it just gives the top 3 or 4 clubs equal chances of winning without being unduly advantageous towards strength in numbers.
|
|
|
Post by issac on Oct 10, 2009 10:26:43 GMT
i looked into different ways this year
trouble is each way is flawed
|
|
|
Post by yellowshark on Oct 10, 2009 11:05:34 GMT
Sorry Dan, to be clear, it wasn't my intent to infer you were saying the club didn't deserve to win, of course we did
|
|
|
Post by mark robinson on Oct 10, 2009 13:10:55 GMT
I agree with Dan in that there should be a way that a club with less enterants could win the club championship, but as Ian said every way has a flaw. Scrap the club chamionship maybe and then award an overall trophy/certificate for everyone that has completed "x" number of rounds ;D
|
|