|
|
Post by yellowshark on Mar 29, 2010 11:33:11 GMT
There you go then, forget about mechanical grip and "agreed" 50% reduction in downforce. All you need is a random weather model, displayed to all teams, supported by a sprinkler system. Cheap and effective ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Reuben on Mar 29, 2010 11:55:56 GMT
haha, yes! the race was definitely worth watching.
But still those ferrari's seem harder than any other car to overtake - I wonder if they have something secret on there that is disturbing the air more than other cars? even Alonso couldnt get past his team-mate Massa - who he was quicker than.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowshark on Mar 29, 2010 12:10:42 GMT
Yeah I couldn't work that one out either! Nice spot on the illegal turbulence, no doubt Todt turned a blind eye, nothjing changes ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by martinchallis on Mar 29, 2010 12:34:08 GMT
i propose sector one wet, 2 dryish, 3 dry - that would be fun!
|
|
|
|
Post by oldtimeracer on Mar 29, 2010 14:30:49 GMT
Maybe the safety car should be fitted with sprinklers? A few laps behind that every so often would be interesting.
Failing that race every weekend in the UK you would be guaranteed of wet races that way!
Was a good exciting race though for a change. Hope it keeps up.
I am also thinking illegal turbulence though. Would not be too difficult to make that happen I am sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by lesbaldry on Mar 29, 2010 15:14:34 GMT
I am also thinking illegal turbulence though. Would not be too difficult to make that happen I am sure. Illegal turbulence?...clever idea though "if poss??"...I wonder how that would be scrutinized. |
|
