|
|
Post by yellowshark on Mar 13, 2009 15:40:24 GMT
A set I ordered from Microtech racing in December have just turned up - guess they must have some stock
|
|
|
|
Post by otr on Mar 13, 2009 15:55:03 GMT
So has everyone else. Shame no one uses them anymore.
|
|
|
|
Post by lesbaldry on Mar 13, 2009 16:43:43 GMT
So has everyone else. Shame no one uses them anymore. RP 24's are soooooooo much beter  |
|
|
|
Post by Reuben on Mar 13, 2009 17:26:32 GMT
run them with a 10.5 sunday........ ill give them 5 laps before their ruined  may be able to use them in stock on VERY cold mornings... or wait till winter again! |
|
|
|
Post by yellowshark on Mar 13, 2009 21:39:19 GMT
So has everyone else. Shame no one uses them anymore. RP 24's are soooooooo much beter Indeed they are for 1st couple of runs but for longevity and club racing CS22s for me all the time |
|
|
|
Post by Simon Crabb on Mar 13, 2009 23:31:53 GMT
Longevity? I got about 3 meetings out of a set of cs22s. I was a bit disappointed.
|
|
|
|
Post by yellowshark on Mar 14, 2009 9:21:05 GMT
Longevity? I got about 3 meetings out of a set of cs22s. I was a bit disappointed. A 100% improvement on the 24s then Simon ;D |
|
|
|
Post by lesbaldry on Mar 14, 2009 10:07:36 GMT
Longevity? I got about 3 meetings out of a set of cs22s. I was a bit disappointed. A 100% improvement on the 24s then Simon ;D Simon does drive the blue one and like other makes it tends to need softer rubber unlike the purple one that generates plenty of grip on more durable rubber due to a superior chassis ;D....."I hope"  |
|
|
|
Post by yellowshark on Mar 14, 2009 16:47:25 GMT
That's the rub I think Les. You only have to look at F1 to see that different chassis/setup/divering style have a significant effect on the tyre wear. So unless one is comparing apples with apples any comparison is probably limited. Ours is based solely on 27t, moving to 10.5 may well show a different effect. Talking of which....
|
|
|
|
Post by lesbaldry on Mar 14, 2009 21:30:47 GMT
That's the rub I think Les. You only have to look at F1 to see that different chassis/setup/divering style have a significant effect on the tyre wear. So unless one is comparing apples with apples any comparison is probably limited. Ours is based solely on 27t, moving to 10.5 may well show a different effect. Talking of which.... Blimey Pete it was said tongue "n" cheek!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by yellowshark on Mar 14, 2009 23:43:01 GMT
That's the rub I think Les. You only have to look at F1 to see that different chassis/setup/divering style have a significant effect on the tyre wear. So unless one is comparing apples with apples any comparison is probably limited. Ours is based solely on 27t, moving to 10.5 may well show a different effect. Talking of which.... Blimey Pete it was said tongue "n" cheek!!!!!!! LOL I know it was Les but it made me think and in the real World what you said was spot on and I guess it could be equally relevant in our World? I assume for example that a 10.5 will put heat into a tyre quicker than a 27T; what that means in terms of relative tyre wear and whether a different compound would be more suitable I haven't got a clue really  although my guess would be that a harder compound would be more suitable? |
|
although my guess would be that a harder compound would be more suitable?